Corporatisation of retirement villages and aged care – it’s real

In May we predicted that corporations would come to dominate the future of the retirement village sector. We should have added the aged care sector. The drivers we believe are the need for capital to both redevelop old stock and build new villages...

The Weekly Source  profile image
by The Weekly Source

In May we predicted that corporations would come to dominate the future of the retirement village sector. We should have added the aged care sector.

The drivers we believe are the need for capital to both redevelop old stock and build new villages. Capital will only come from wholesale funds – not banks who want fast turnover/liquid assets – and customers will be increasingly sophisticated and complex, demanding new and better value propositions.

The same can be said for aged care. And small operators will not be able to attract either on scale – funding and customers.

Last week we reported on Australian Unity (a mutual Not For Profit) paying $114 million to buy the NSW government’s home care business with 4,000 staff, 50,000 customers and 70% market share.

This week RSL Care and RDNS (both Not for Profits) merge to recreate 6,000 staff who will deliver integrated care across community care, home care, aged care and retirement villages. They are also planning new local hospital support services.

In aged care there is talk of Estia and Allity joining imminently as well – creating a group of about 120 care facilities, leap frogging Bupa at 70 (another mutual).

Between now and Christmas there are at least three significant additional consolidation moves that will take place in the retirement village and aged care sectors.

We said five years for corporatisation to be complete. It could be sooner.

Read More

puzzles,videos,hash-videos,pdf